<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s the Carbs, Not the Calories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/</link>
	<description>Blog site for the comedy-documentary Fat Head</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>Quick Question: I've watched the animated clip of "Why Your Got Fat" a few times. At the end of it, there are little blue dots in the artery with an "L" in them. What does the "L" stand for? Lipid? Something else? Thanks.

&lt;em&gt;Lipoprotein Lipase.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick Question: I&#8217;ve watched the animated clip of &#8220;Why Your Got Fat&#8221; a few times. At the end of it, there are little blue dots in the artery with an &#8220;L&#8221; in them. What does the &#8220;L&#8221; stand for? Lipid? Something else? Thanks.</p>
<p><em>Lipoprotein Lipase.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matlock</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Matlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>I think that there probably is some sort of inter-relationships between weight and exercise.

Speaking personally I found it almost impossible to exercise (i.e. jogging 45mins 4 times per week) when I was 20kgs over weight. 

After three  months of Taube/Atkins inspired eating I had lost the excess, found exercise much easier and more enjoyable so I did more creating a virtuous circle. Loosing weight enables you to exercise not the other way around.

I think exercise is useful for keeping the weight off.  It enables you to cheat more diet wise and get away with it and it releases various feel good chemicals into your body which acts a mild anti-depressant.

&lt;em&gt;I believe you've got the relationship right; when your diet allows your body to burn fat, you feel more like using that fuel.  The one area where exercise seems to really help is in up-regulating insulin sensitivity, which helps keep your overall insulin level lower.  Hard work -- weights, cross-training, etc. -- appears to be better for insulin levels than aerobics.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there probably is some sort of inter-relationships between weight and exercise.</p>
<p>Speaking personally I found it almost impossible to exercise (i.e. jogging 45mins 4 times per week) when I was 20kgs over weight. </p>
<p>After three  months of Taube/Atkins inspired eating I had lost the excess, found exercise much easier and more enjoyable so I did more creating a virtuous circle. Loosing weight enables you to exercise not the other way around.</p>
<p>I think exercise is useful for keeping the weight off.  It enables you to cheat more diet wise and get away with it and it releases various feel good chemicals into your body which acts a mild anti-depressant.</p>
<p><em>I believe you&#8217;ve got the relationship right; when your diet allows your body to burn fat, you feel more like using that fuel.  The one area where exercise seems to really help is in up-regulating insulin sensitivity, which helps keep your overall insulin level lower.  Hard work &#8212; weights, cross-training, etc. &#8212; appears to be better for insulin levels than aerobics.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>My dad was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in late 2005.  Until his younger brother said, "I have it too," Dad thought he was the only one in his family.  OK, his mom had several strokes and his dad died of heart problems back in 1980 so they probably had issues related to diabetes, but as far as we know nobody had gone full-blown until Dad and Uncle Abbie.

I saw his little cohort of meds.  A statin, an anti-reflux drug and he might have been on a diabetes med too but I'm not sure.  I have no idea what his doc told him to do as far as lifestyle changes but I'm pretty sure it was some variation of "eat less fat and calories, eat more fruits and veggies and fiber."  Dad interpreted this as "an orange with breakfast, an anemic-looking salad or tomato with dinner and I ain't giving up my Evangeline Maid bread, thankyouverymuch."  He told me later he'd "gotten better."  Yeah right, dad.  He always hated doctors.

Well, late last year he informed me he'd been in the hospital April 2008 with major blood loss.  It had taken a while to sneak up on him;  they caught it on an annual exam.  I did a Google search for "diabetes anemia" and guess what?  He may be in the early stages of kidney damage.

I try to tell him about this stuff.  Useless.  He vaguely understands kidneys have something to do with going pee.  He knows next to zero about how diabetes works.  This is not an unintelligent man.  He joined the Navy in 1970, retired in 1992 and managed to attain Senior Chief rank along the way.  He just never saw any reason to learn about the human body, just as I never saw any reason to learn calculus--or join the Navy.

I doubt my father will live to see seventy.  I hope I'm wrong.

Meanwhile after all my reading I'm coming to believe I got a bad start in the first place because my mother has always eaten like crap.  If you look at me head-on, the midline of my face is crooked.  Always has been even before the orthodontia and the headgear.  I found Weston A. Price's book on a website last night and compared the photos of people on traditional diets versus people on industrial diets and considered that when I was a small child my sprouting permanent teeth were so crooked and my jaw so misaligned that I often got in trouble for eating my meals too slowly.  My lower jaw is still underdeveloped.  It's a mess.  I look around and every other person I see has a narrow, pinched-looking face, some with bad teeth and some who had to have had braces growing up.  (And some who have them now, as adults!)  I think that even if we get this obesity thing sorted, our next big crisis is going to be, as Dr. Price put it, the physical degeneration of entire generations of American and other post-industrial children.

My daughter was born with reflux in both ureters, an underdeveloped right kidney and a propensity for tooth decay that cost her her upper front baby teeth (they're all capped now and she's lost one at age four).  Her brother suffers from a central auditory processing deficit and obesity.  I won't be having any more kids.  It isn't fair to them.

&lt;em&gt;Sorry your dad (and you) have had such a rough time of it.  That's what all this nutritional nonsense is doing to people.  I needed braces and so did my wife, so it'll be interesting to see what happens with our daughters.  They like their meat and eggs and nuts, and while we give them bread if they ask for it, they rarely do.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in late 2005.  Until his younger brother said, &#8220;I have it too,&#8221; Dad thought he was the only one in his family.  OK, his mom had several strokes and his dad died of heart problems back in 1980 so they probably had issues related to diabetes, but as far as we know nobody had gone full-blown until Dad and Uncle Abbie.</p>
<p>I saw his little cohort of meds.  A statin, an anti-reflux drug and he might have been on a diabetes med too but I&#8217;m not sure.  I have no idea what his doc told him to do as far as lifestyle changes but I&#8217;m pretty sure it was some variation of &#8220;eat less fat and calories, eat more fruits and veggies and fiber.&#8221;  Dad interpreted this as &#8220;an orange with breakfast, an anemic-looking salad or tomato with dinner and I ain&#8217;t giving up my Evangeline Maid bread, thankyouverymuch.&#8221;  He told me later he&#8217;d &#8220;gotten better.&#8221;  Yeah right, dad.  He always hated doctors.</p>
<p>Well, late last year he informed me he&#8217;d been in the hospital April 2008 with major blood loss.  It had taken a while to sneak up on him;  they caught it on an annual exam.  I did a Google search for &#8220;diabetes anemia&#8221; and guess what?  He may be in the early stages of kidney damage.</p>
<p>I try to tell him about this stuff.  Useless.  He vaguely understands kidneys have something to do with going pee.  He knows next to zero about how diabetes works.  This is not an unintelligent man.  He joined the Navy in 1970, retired in 1992 and managed to attain Senior Chief rank along the way.  He just never saw any reason to learn about the human body, just as I never saw any reason to learn calculus&#8211;or join the Navy.</p>
<p>I doubt my father will live to see seventy.  I hope I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>Meanwhile after all my reading I&#8217;m coming to believe I got a bad start in the first place because my mother has always eaten like crap.  If you look at me head-on, the midline of my face is crooked.  Always has been even before the orthodontia and the headgear.  I found Weston A. Price&#8217;s book on a website last night and compared the photos of people on traditional diets versus people on industrial diets and considered that when I was a small child my sprouting permanent teeth were so crooked and my jaw so misaligned that I often got in trouble for eating my meals too slowly.  My lower jaw is still underdeveloped.  It&#8217;s a mess.  I look around and every other person I see has a narrow, pinched-looking face, some with bad teeth and some who had to have had braces growing up.  (And some who have them now, as adults!)  I think that even if we get this obesity thing sorted, our next big crisis is going to be, as Dr. Price put it, the physical degeneration of entire generations of American and other post-industrial children.</p>
<p>My daughter was born with reflux in both ureters, an underdeveloped right kidney and a propensity for tooth decay that cost her her upper front baby teeth (they&#8217;re all capped now and she&#8217;s lost one at age four).  Her brother suffers from a central auditory processing deficit and obesity.  I won&#8217;t be having any more kids.  It isn&#8217;t fair to them.</p>
<p><em>Sorry your dad (and you) have had such a rough time of it.  That&#8217;s what all this nutritional nonsense is doing to people.  I needed braces and so did my wife, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens with our daughters.  They like their meat and eggs and nuts, and while we give them bread if they ask for it, they rarely do.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Dr Eades also talked about that aspect of that book on his website. I understood what you were trying to say, I was just being optimistic that it won't continue forever.

I suppose 'philosopher's stone' has always been used in the literature as something that, on the surface, is brilliant and wonderful and 6 shades of awesome but always brings out the worst in human nature and outcomes (Midas etc.). 

Interestingly enough, Azoth was a term for a universal medicine in alchemy, and is also the word for nitrogen in Slavic. This is coincidental however...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Eades also talked about that aspect of that book on his website. I understood what you were trying to say, I was just being optimistic that it won&#8217;t continue forever.</p>
<p>I suppose &#8216;philosopher&#8217;s stone&#8217; has always been used in the literature as something that, on the surface, is brilliant and wonderful and 6 shades of awesome but always brings out the worst in human nature and outcomes (Midas etc.). </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, Azoth was a term for a universal medicine in alchemy, and is also the word for nitrogen in Slavic. This is coincidental however&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I should have been more explicit. I do quite literally mean the philosopher's stone and a perpetual motion machine. {The fascinating book, "The Alchemy of Air" by Thomas Hager, is the story of the development of the Haber-Bosch process). This process makes 'gold' (fixed nitrogen in the form of ammonia) from air. The inert atmospheric nitrogen, as ammonia, is used as fertilizer from which much more gold (profits) are amassed. The fertilizer is turned into, golden in color even, corn which is fed to cows and to  us as corn oil, etc. The 'gold' from the air is converted to foodstuffs that end up in our chow and make us sick. Big Pharma comes to the rescue and makes us sicker by filling us full of statins and directing docs to tell us to keep eating grains and less and less animal fat to continue the illnesses. This is definitely a viscous, mega-profit generating cycle, begun by the spinning of air into 'gold'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have been more explicit. I do quite literally mean the philosopher&#8217;s stone and a perpetual motion machine. {The fascinating book, &#8220;The Alchemy of Air&#8221; by Thomas Hager, is the story of the development of the Haber-Bosch process). This process makes &#8216;gold&#8217; (fixed nitrogen in the form of ammonia) from air. The inert atmospheric nitrogen, as ammonia, is used as fertilizer from which much more gold (profits) are amassed. The fertilizer is turned into, golden in color even, corn which is fed to cows and to  us as corn oil, etc. The &#8216;gold&#8217; from the air is converted to foodstuffs that end up in our chow and make us sick. Big Pharma comes to the rescue and makes us sicker by filling us full of statins and directing docs to tell us to keep eating grains and less and less animal fat to continue the illnesses. This is definitely a viscous, mega-profit generating cycle, begun by the spinning of air into &#8216;gold&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Laurie, it certainly seems that way at this point in time, though the philosophers stone is more like fools gold and the perpetual motion machine is more like a pyramid scheme. Fools gold because its rubbish and those uninformed won't know the difference, pyramid scheme because it keeps expanding on the basis of the first acts of deceit. Eventually it must come tumbling down, the question is how many people will have diabetes by the time it does...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie, it certainly seems that way at this point in time, though the philosophers stone is more like fools gold and the perpetual motion machine is more like a pyramid scheme. Fools gold because its rubbish and those uninformed won&#8217;t know the difference, pyramid scheme because it keeps expanding on the basis of the first acts of deceit. Eventually it must come tumbling down, the question is how many people will have diabetes by the time it does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Among many of my brain-f@rts and epiphanies, is this
one. The (1)eat low-fat, (2)eat high-carb, and
(3)drug-down-cholesterol-with-statins is a perfect
storm and bad advice trifecta. It's a
make-and-keep-people-unhealthy prescription that comes
at folks on every level, IMHO. Honestly, like you, I do not
believe this was a conspiracy by Big Pharma or the
gov'ment, but the effect is astonishing. This was arrogance (by Keys and
McGovern) and not malice, but the end result today, in
2009, is profound. Big Pharma and soy and corn growers
have been handed the Philosophers' stone and a
perpetual motion machine. I know from physics that the
perpetual motion machine is impossible, but this is
pretty darn near close to one. The profits they make
are staggering.
  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
repeatedly but expecting different results. Treatment
of symptoms, like treating 'high' cholesterol by
lowering it further just makes everything WORSE. And
then adding inflammation-inducing fructose and insulin
and vege Frankenfats, wow. We have a heatlh care
crisis in the U.S., but guess what I think the cause
and the cures for it are?

&lt;em&gt;From a dietary standpoint, we couldn't have done much worse.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among many of my brain-f@rts and epiphanies, is this<br />
one. The (1)eat low-fat, (2)eat high-carb, and<br />
(3)drug-down-cholesterol-with-statins is a perfect<br />
storm and bad advice trifecta. It&#8217;s a<br />
make-and-keep-people-unhealthy prescription that comes<br />
at folks on every level, IMHO. Honestly, like you, I do not<br />
believe this was a conspiracy by Big Pharma or the<br />
gov&#8217;ment, but the effect is astonishing. This was arrogance (by Keys and<br />
McGovern) and not malice, but the end result today, in<br />
2009, is profound. Big Pharma and soy and corn growers<br />
have been handed the Philosophers&#8217; stone and a<br />
perpetual motion machine. I know from physics that the<br />
perpetual motion machine is impossible, but this is<br />
pretty darn near close to one. The profits they make<br />
are staggering.<br />
  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing<br />
repeatedly but expecting different results. Treatment<br />
of symptoms, like treating &#8216;high&#8217; cholesterol by<br />
lowering it further just makes everything WORSE. And<br />
then adding inflammation-inducing fructose and insulin<br />
and vege Frankenfats, wow. We have a heatlh care<br />
crisis in the U.S., but guess what I think the cause<br />
and the cures for it are?</p>
<p><em>From a dietary standpoint, we couldn&#8217;t have done much worse.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrik</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-553</guid>
		<description>@KD and @@Tom Naughton

With regard to food subsidies, have you watched the documentary "King Corn"?

http://kingcorn.net/

It explores exactly that -- public policy and food subsidies.  Most importantly, without gratuitous "gotcha"-s and embarrassment of its subjects.  In this case, the Iowa corn farmers, who know they are producing, well, crap.  

I recommend throwing it in the Netflix queue and watching it.

&lt;em&gt;It's on my to-do list.  I noticed it's available for instant viewing on NetFlix, so I'll catch it one of these nights.  Thanks for the reminder.

I don't blame the farmers.  I blame the politicians who buy their votes with my money.
&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KD and @@Tom Naughton</p>
<p>With regard to food subsidies, have you watched the documentary &#8220;King Corn&#8221;?</p>
<p><a href="http://kingcorn.net/" rel="nofollow">http://kingcorn.net/</a></p>
<p>It explores exactly that &#8212; public policy and food subsidies.  Most importantly, without gratuitous &#8220;gotcha&#8221;-s and embarrassment of its subjects.  In this case, the Iowa corn farmers, who know they are producing, well, crap.  </p>
<p>I recommend throwing it in the Netflix queue and watching it.</p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s on my to-do list.  I noticed it&#8217;s available for instant viewing on NetFlix, so I&#8217;ll catch it one of these nights.  Thanks for the reminder.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame the farmers.  I blame the politicians who buy their votes with my money.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 10:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-548</guid>
		<description>I am sorry to hear your mother was on a statin, but glad to hear that you are a VERY good son and convinced her to stop taking it. In my family, we have just convinced an 84-year-old woman to stop and I'm helping another 58-year-old lady craft a letter to her doc -who wants her to get on them. She's writing the letter to inform doc that she won't be taking the statin, and because she wants to try to build awareness. We can dream can't we?
     I have to calm down because I get stressed about  this. Statins are now regularly prescribed for 'primary prevention' in groups that can't possibly benefit from them. 'Primary Prevention' means taking a drug against a disease you don't yet have. 'An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure' is certainly perverted in the case of statins misused in this way.  A woman dosed with statins is being prevented from a disease she is unlikely to get. An older woman is being prevented from getting a disease she is unlikely to get in the remaining time allotted. An older man on them is--- time remaining thing again..... Although if you get the man to start taking them when they're younger, it's easier to convince them.
And the biggest travesty is that  these poisons have just been approved for children as young as 8. Wow, 'primary prevention' run amok. I certainly had no idea the 'diseases of civilization' were CAUSED by deficiency and low-blood levels of Lipitor. Thanks for allowing my rants past the moderator.

&lt;em&gt;Rants happily accepted.  The drive to push statins on everyone is insane.  Pushing statins on elderly women is worse than useless; it's probably harmful.  Your body makes cholesterol for all kinds of reasons, one of which appears to be protection against cancer.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry to hear your mother was on a statin, but glad to hear that you are a VERY good son and convinced her to stop taking it. In my family, we have just convinced an 84-year-old woman to stop and I&#8217;m helping another 58-year-old lady craft a letter to her doc -who wants her to get on them. She&#8217;s writing the letter to inform doc that she won&#8217;t be taking the statin, and because she wants to try to build awareness. We can dream can&#8217;t we?<br />
     I have to calm down because I get stressed about  this. Statins are now regularly prescribed for &#8216;primary prevention&#8217; in groups that can&#8217;t possibly benefit from them. &#8216;Primary Prevention&#8217; means taking a drug against a disease you don&#8217;t yet have. &#8216;An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure&#8217; is certainly perverted in the case of statins misused in this way.  A woman dosed with statins is being prevented from a disease she is unlikely to get. An older woman is being prevented from getting a disease she is unlikely to get in the remaining time allotted. An older man on them is&#8212; time remaining thing again&#8230;.. Although if you get the man to start taking them when they&#8217;re younger, it&#8217;s easier to convince them.<br />
And the biggest travesty is that  these poisons have just been approved for children as young as 8. Wow, &#8216;primary prevention&#8217; run amok. I certainly had no idea the &#8216;diseases of civilization&#8217; were CAUSED by deficiency and low-blood levels of Lipitor. Thanks for allowing my rants past the moderator.</p>
<p><em>Rants happily accepted.  The drive to push statins on everyone is insane.  Pushing statins on elderly women is worse than useless; it&#8217;s probably harmful.  Your body makes cholesterol for all kinds of reasons, one of which appears to be protection against cancer.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KD</title>
		<link>http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2009/05/14/its-the-carbs-not-the-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>KD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 06:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathead-movie.com/?p=305#comment-544</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"But in a country where sugar, wheat and corn are all subsidized by the taxpayers, I don’t expect this kind of policy shift to happen anytime soon.&lt;/i&gt;"

I feel that this is the biggest problem.  Even if the government read GCBC and believed every word (and hey, maybe they did and do!), it would be incredibly difficult to go back on the current dietary recommendations, not because they'd be admitting they were wrong (though I'm sure that's part of it, too), but because they'd never be willing to give up the money they receive from agriculture lobbyists.

In that sense, I feel that a huge part of the solution is to get rid of the subsidies in the first place... isn't corn and soy so prevalent in our food as fillers and additives because it's so cheap due to those subsidies?  But I know the chances of that happening is also next to none for the aforementioned reason.

&lt;em&gt;And what's really annoying is that that farm subsidies were supposed to be a "temporary" form of assistance during the Depression.  There's nothing as permanent as a temporary government program.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;But in a country where sugar, wheat and corn are all subsidized by the taxpayers, I don’t expect this kind of policy shift to happen anytime soon.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I feel that this is the biggest problem.  Even if the government read GCBC and believed every word (and hey, maybe they did and do!), it would be incredibly difficult to go back on the current dietary recommendations, not because they&#8217;d be admitting they were wrong (though I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s part of it, too), but because they&#8217;d never be willing to give up the money they receive from agriculture lobbyists.</p>
<p>In that sense, I feel that a huge part of the solution is to get rid of the subsidies in the first place&#8230; isn&#8217;t corn and soy so prevalent in our food as fillers and additives because it&#8217;s so cheap due to those subsidies?  But I know the chances of that happening is also next to none for the aforementioned reason.</p>
<p><em>And what&#8217;s really annoying is that that farm subsidies were supposed to be a &#8220;temporary&#8221; form of assistance during the Depression.  There&#8217;s nothing as permanent as a temporary government program.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
